Inland Waterway Ship Test Case: Difference between revisions
From BAWiki
imported>Mucha Philipp mNo edit summary |
imported>Mucha Philipp No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
A typical '''inland waterway ship''' as encountered in European inland shipping was designed | A typical '''inland [[waterway]] ship''' as encountered in European inland shipping was designed | ||
for the purpose of establishing a benchmark test case for numerical and experimental | for the purpose of establishing a benchmark test case for numerical and experimental | ||
methods. | methods. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Propulsion, | * Propulsion, | ||
* Manouevring, | * Manouevring, | ||
* Bank effects. | * [[Bank]] effects. | ||
Particular incentives for establishing the test case stem from the increasing importance | Particular incentives for establishing the test case stem from the increasing importance | ||
of ship handling simulators for navigability analyses and the advance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coming into operation for hydrodynamic analyses and parameter identification for manouevring models. | of ship handling simulators for navigability analyses and the advance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coming into operation for hydrodynamic analyses and parameter [[identification]] for manouevring models. | ||
Ship hydrodynamics in shallow water differ from deep water conditions in terms | Ship hydrodynamics in [[shallow water]] differ from [[deep water]] conditions in terms | ||
of the pressure field ambient to the ship underway, wave patterns, dynamic changes | of the pressure field ambient to the ship underway, wave patterns, dynamic changes | ||
in floating position (squat) and underkeel-clearance (UKC), a complex flow regime | in floating position (squat) and underkeel-clearance (UKC), a complex flow regime | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
to propellers. | to propellers. | ||
CAD files available upon request: Please contact '''philipp.mucha@uni-due.de''' | |||
[http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09377255.2017.1349723 Introduction of test case] | [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09377255.2017.1349723 Introduction of test case] | ||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801818314914?via%3Dihub Resistance and Propulsion] | [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801818314914?via%3Dihub Resistance and Propulsion] | ||
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141118718303638 Free-running Maneuvers] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 7 January 2019
A typical inland waterway ship as encountered in European inland shipping was designed for the purpose of establishing a benchmark test case for numerical and experimental methods.
Investigations center on
- Resistance,
- Propulsion,
- Manouevring,
- Bank effects.
Particular incentives for establishing the test case stem from the increasing importance of ship handling simulators for navigability analyses and the advance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coming into operation for hydrodynamic analyses and parameter identification for manouevring models.
Ship hydrodynamics in shallow water differ from deep water conditions in terms of the pressure field ambient to the ship underway, wave patterns, dynamic changes in floating position (squat) and underkeel-clearance (UKC), a complex flow regime in the UKC region involving distinct flow separation in the after body and oblique inflow to propellers.
CAD files available upon request: Please contact philipp.mucha@uni-due.de